The Treasury Laws Amendment (2019 Tax Integrity and Other Measures No. 1) Act 2019 changed the law to ensure that an individual’s superannuation salary sacrifice contributions cannot be used to reduce OTE or count towards a payer’s minimum superannuation guarantee contributions, if the pre-sacrifice payment was salary or wages for superannuation guarantee purposes.
To bring these changes into the scope of STP reporting, the Treasury Laws Amendment (2019 Measures No. 3) Act 2020 requires employers to report salary sacrificed amounts paid to their employees’ superannuation funds.
For STP Phase 2, this means that if employees were formerly (STP Phase 1) not included in the report, as 100% of their payments were sacrificed, including sacrifice to superannuation, those employees must now be reported. For example, if an employee had reportable payments of 50,000 and 30,000 was sacrificed to superannuation and 20,000 was sacrificed to other employee benefits, resulting in taxable gross of zero, this employee may have previously been excluded but must now be reported.
The values permissible for the salary sacrifice type are:
If, however, the payee has sacrificed exempt foreign income, then that sacrificed amount must not be reported discretely and must reduce the YTD amount reported as Exempt Foreign Income.
For OTE purposes, salary sacrifice to superannuation is included, as it would have been OTE, had it not been sacrificed into a complying super fund or RSA. However, other employee benefits (non-cash) are not salary or wages and thus not OTE.
This definition assumes the bottom-up method of salary packaging, as defined in Methods of Salary Sacrifice in Payroll below.
An effective salary sacrifice arrangement is one where the approved agreement between employer and employee is in place before the payments to be sacrificed have been accrued, earned or are payable. Payments that may be sacrificed are defined in Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (TAA 1953) are salary and wages defined by:
There are some payments that cannot be sacrificed:
Whilst payments may be sacrificed to a complying superannuation fund, other employee benefits may include:
It is critical, therefore, that all payment types reported in STP Phase 2 be reported for their pre-sacrificed value and not the post-sacrificed amount, other than the exception referenced above for Exempt Foreign Income.
The correct ATO derived aggregated gross YTD amount cannot be correct if the post-sacrificed YTD amount of payment types are reported, in addition to the amount of the salary sacrifice. That will double count the salary sacrifice reduction and result in a lower value than the correct taxable amount of total gross that has been declared "true and correct".
This requirement may result in a range of impacts to existing pay codes and computations within payroll solutions, depending on the method of salary packaging used. For example, both paid leave and gross typically remunerate “ordinary time” that may be sacrificed.
All references to salary sacrifice in current ATO guidance and rulings assumes that these amounts are positive values in addition to the salary or wages. That is one method of managing salary sacrifice in payroll (bottom-up), but not the only one. There are two methods that may be used in payroll for salary packaging:
The reason the methods are referenced as such is due to the cash component value. For the bottom-up method, the post-sacrificed amount is the cash component in the package. However, for the top-down method, the pre-sacrificed amount and each of the salary sacrifice types are all "cash components" that result in the post-sacrificed amount.
It is the cash components from which the PAYG is withheld. This automatically addresses the issue of refunds (or positive) of salary sacrifice that may occur in specific circumstances.
In payroll, salary sacrifice pay codes stand alone. That is, they do not reduce the value of other pay codes within the payroll. However, they do reduce the gross taxable amount paid to the payee. In STP phase 1, the independence of the pay codes sometimes resulted in an initial "negative YTD" amount in the pay event, where negatives were permitted. However, with the move to STP phase 2 and the disaggregation of gross model, this issue cannot occur.
The following tables illustrate this concept, taking these components into account:
Payroll | PAYGW | OTE |
YTD Amount |
STP Phase 1 | STP Phase 2 |
Post-sacrificed salary or wages | Yes | Yes | 70,000 | INB-Taxable Gross | Not reported |
Salary Sacrifice – Superannuation | No | Yes | 20,000 | Not reported | SAW > Salary Sacrifice Type-S (Superannuation) |
Salary Sacrifice – Other employee benefits | No | No | 10,000 | Not reported | SAW > Salary Sacrifice Type-O (Other employee benefits) |
Pre-sacrificed salary or wages (Calculated) | 70,000 | 90,000 | 100,000 | Not reported | SAW > Gross |
Employer Liability | 8,550 | Superannuation Liability | Super Entitlement Type-L (Superannuation Liability) |
Payroll | PAYGW | OTE | YTD Amount | STP Phase 1 | STP Phase 2 |
Pre-sacrificed salary or wages | Yes | Yes | 1000,000 | INB-Gross | SAW > Gross |
Salary Sacrifice – Superannuation | Yes | No | -20,000 | INB-Gross |
SAW > Salary Sacrifice Type-S (Superannuation) 20,000 [amount × -1] |
Salary Sacrifice – Other employee benefits | Yes | Yes | -10,000 | INB-Gross |
SAW > Salary Sacrifice Type-O (Other employee benefits) 10,000 [amount × -1] |
Pre-sacrificed salary or wages (Calculated) | 70,000 | 90,000 | 100,000 | Not reported | Not reported |
Employer Liability | 8,550 | Superannuation Liability | Super Entitlement Type-L (Superannuation Liability) |
Some businesses outsource the management of the salary sacrifice arrangements to specialist third party providers. This may be due to cost efficiency, specialist skill, core business deviation or many other reasons.
In these circumstances, the total value of the salary sacrifice amounts is paid to the third-party provider and the detail may not be known about the split between the different types of sacrifice: superannuation or other employee benefits. As such, report the YTD amount of the total sacrifice each pay as Salary Sacrifice Type-O (Other employee benefits) until the EOFY when the separate types are available to correct the reported amounts. The correction must occur on or before finalisation. If, however, the specific types of sacrifice are known, report those amounts against the relevant types each pay.
Note: the super liability must be based upon, at least, the minimum OTE requirement that includes both salary or wages and the salary sacrifice – superannuation amounts. |
The following table outlines the reporting of the salary sacrifice amounts, assuming:
Pay Period | Payee Gross (Pre-sacrifice Salary or Wages) | Salary Sacrifice - Super | Salary Sacrifice - Other | Super Liability |
In House (Available each pay) | ||||
10 of 12 | 83,333.33 | 16,666.67 | 8,333.33 | 7,916.67 |
11 of 12 | 91,666.66 | 18,333.33 | 9,166.67 | 8,708.33 |
12 of 12 | 100,000.00 | 20,000.00 | 10,000.00 | 9,500.00 |
Pay Period | Payee Gross (Pre-sacrifice Salary or Wages) | Salary Sacrifice - Super | Salary Sacrifice - Other | Super Liability |
Outsourced (Available at EOFY) | ||||
10 of 12 | 83,333.33 | Not reported | 8,333.33 | 7,916.67 |
11 of 12 | 91,666.66 | Not reported | 9,166.67 | 8,708.33 |
12 of 12 | 100,000.00 | Not reported | 10,000.00 | 9,500.00 |
Correction | 100,000.00 | 20,000.00 | 10,000.00 | 9,500.00 |
This scenario is illustrated by the following diagram:
There are circumstances where the salary sacrificed amount may have been made in error, such as for:
These circumstances may result in a refund of the salary sacrifice amounts, reducing the YTD amounts reported in STP. However, when key factors for reporting change, these may result in a negative YTD amount, such as:
A refund of a salary sacrificed amount is taxable income. Given that, regardless of the salary sacrifice method used, a salary sacrificed amount is reported as positive in STP, if a refund of salary sacrifice occurs, this may be reported in STP as a negative YTD amount and is subject to withholding, if the refund amount is in excess of the existing YTD positive amount.
The following scenario outlines a refund of salary sacrifice for an in-house arrangement: